Code Interpreter vs. Azure Functions: Stop The Python Misuse!
Microsoft just made Python “run natively” inside Power Platform — and chaos followed.
From Copilot Studio’s Code Interpreter to Azure Functions, everyone’s suddenly a Python dev… until the flows time out, the files hit 512 MB, and IT gets a heart attack.
In this episode, we break down the great Python illusion: why “runs natively” ≠ “runs anywhere,” what the Code Interpreter actually is (a sealed glass terrarium for code), and when to stop pretending it’s production infrastructure.
Then we contrast it with Azure Functions, the real grown-up runtime — scalable, governed, auditable — and explain how to move from prototype to production without setting your tenant on fire.
🔍 Key Topics Covered 1️⃣ The Python Problem in Power Platform
- Why “Python runs natively” doesn’t mean “Python runs anywhere.”
- The rise of Code Interpreter inside Copilot Studio—and the chaos that followed.
- The real reason flows time out and files hit 512 MB limits.
- Why using Azure Functions for everything—or nothing—is equally misguided.
2️⃣ The Code Interpreter: Microsoft’s New Python Sandbox
- How Code Interpreter works inside Copilot Studio (the “glass terrarium” analogy).
- Admin controls: why Python execution is disabled by default.
- What it can actually do: CSV transformations, data cleanup, basic analytics.
- Key limitations: no internet calls, no pip installs, and strict timeouts.
- Why Microsoft made it intentionally safe and limited for business users.
- Real-world examples of using it correctly for ad-hoc data prep and reporting.
3️⃣ Azure Functions: Python Without Training Wheels
- What makes Azure Functions the true enterprise-grade Python runtime.
- The difference between sandbox snippets and event-driven microservices.
- How Azure Functions scales automatically, handles dependencies, and logs everything.
- Integration with Power Automate and Power Apps for secure, versioned automation.
- Governance, observability, and why IT actually loves this model.
- Example: processing gigabytes of sales data without breaking a sweat.
4️⃣ The Illusion of Convenience
- Why teams keep mistaking Code Interpreter for production infrastructure.
- How “sandbox convenience” turns into “production chaos.”
- The cost illusion: why “free inside Power Platform” still burns your capacity.
- The hidden governance risks of unmonitored Copilot scripts.
- How Azure Functions delivers professional reliability vs. chat-prompt volatility.
5️⃣ The Decision Framework — When to Use Which
- A practical rulebook for choosing the right tool:
- Code Interpreter = immediate, disposable, interactive.
- Azure Functions = recurring, scalable, governed.
- Governance and compliance boundaries between Power Platform and Azure.
- Security contrasts: sandbox vs. managed identities and VNET isolation.
- Maintenance and version control differences—why prompts don’t scale.
- The “Prototype-to-Production Loop”: start ideas in Code Interpreter, deploy in Functions.
- How to align analysts and architects in one workflow.
6️⃣ The Enterprise Reality Check
- How quotas, throttles, and limits affect Python inside Power Platform.
- Understanding compute capacity and why Code Interpreter isn’t truly “free.”
- Security posture: sandbox isolation vs. Azure-grade governance.
- Cost models: prepaid licensing vs. consumption billing.
- Audit readiness: why Functions produce evidence and prompts produce panic.
- Real-world governance failure stories—and how to prevent them.
7️⃣ Final Takeaway: Stop the Misuse
- Code Interpreter is for experiments, not enterprise pipelines.
- Azure Functions is for scalable, auditable, production-ready automation.
- Mixing them up doesn’t make you clever—it makes you a liability.
- Prototype fast in Copilot, deploy properly in Azure.
- Because “responsible architecture” isn’t a buzzword—it’s how you keep your job.
🧠 Key Takeaways
- Code Interpreter = sandbox: great for small data prep, visualizations, or lightweight automations inside Copilot Studio.
- Azure Functions = infrastructure: perfect for production workloads, scalable automation, and secure integration across systems.
- Don’t confuse ease for capability. The sandbox is for testing; the Function is for delivering.
- Prototype → Promote → Deploy: the golden loop that balances agility with governance.
- Governance, monitoring, and cost management matter as much as performance.
🔗 Episode Mentions & Resources
- Microsoft Docs: Python in Power Platform (Code Interpreter)
- Azure Functions Overview
- Power Platform Admin Center — Enable Code Execution
- Copilot Studio for Power Platform
🎧 Listen & Subscribe If this episode saved you from another flow timeout or a late-night “why did it fail again?” crisis—subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Follow for upcoming deep dives into:
- Copilot in the enterprise
- AI governance frameworks
- Low-code meets pro-code: the future of automation
Hit Follow, enable notifications, and let every new episode arrive like a scheduled task—on time, with zero drama.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.
Follow us on:
LInkedIn
Substack
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,640
Everyone's using Python in Power Platform wrong.
2
00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:03,720
Yes, wrong.
3
00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:05,360
Microsoft hands people a chef's knife
4
00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,600
and half of them are using it to spread butter.
5
00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:08,680
You've probably seen it.
6
00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:12,080
Someone here's Python now runs natively in Power Platform
7
00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:14,960
and immediately tries to rebuild an ETL pipeline,
8
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:17,520
then wonders why their flow times out like a toddler
9
00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:18,920
denied an iPad.
10
00:00:18,920 --> 00:00:19,960
Here's the problem.
11
00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:22,320
Microsoft quietly dropped native Python support
12
00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:24,240
through something called the code interpreter.
13
00:00:24,240 --> 00:00:27,120
It's astonishingly convenient, literally plug a Python command
14
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,960
into co-pilot and it runs right there in your environment.
15
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,840
Yet, somehow everyone keeps over complicating things.
16
00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:35,640
They still deploy Azure functions for trivial file conversions
17
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:36,840
or numerical calculations
18
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,160
that could have been done right inside the chat prompt.
19
00:00:39,160 --> 00:00:41,000
And yes, the inverse is equally foolish,
20
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,320
running massive enterprise workloads inside a prompt
21
00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:44,600
like it's a hobby project.
22
00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:46,440
The confusion stems from this misconception
23
00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:48,240
that both tools do the same thing.
24
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:49,040
They don't.
25
00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:52,520
Once a sandbox scratch pad designed for quick experimentation,
26
00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:55,480
the others are fully managed production grade runtime.
27
00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,960
Mixing them up is like confusing microwave popcorn
28
00:00:57,960 --> 00:00:59,160
with a Michelin kitchen.
29
00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:00,280
So let's simplify.
30
00:01:00,280 --> 00:01:03,880
Code interpreter is instant ramen, fast packaged, self-contained,
31
00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:05,080
but no one should live on it.
32
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:06,760
Azure functions, on the other hand,
33
00:01:06,760 --> 00:01:09,560
is the full culinary setup, knives, pans,
34
00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:11,240
and fire extinguishers included.
35
00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:12,680
By the end of this explanation,
36
00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:14,360
you'll know exactly when to use which
37
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:16,440
and when to stop embarrassing your tenant admins
38
00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:18,840
with half-baked data automation experiments.
39
00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:21,880
Now let's talk about where all this confusion really starts.
40
00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:25,000
Inside Microsoft's shiny new Python sandbox.
41
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:28,120
Enter the code interpreter, Python's new sandbox.
42
00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:30,280
The code interpreter didn't emerge from nowhere.
43
00:01:30,280 --> 00:01:32,360
It crawled out of co-pilot studio.
44
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:34,120
The part of Microsoft 365
45
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:36,920
where chatbots and automation meet polite chaos.
46
00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,320
For years, makers begged for native scripting
47
00:01:39,320 --> 00:01:41,080
instead of clunky connectors.
48
00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:43,640
Microsoft finally relented and suddenly Python appeared
49
00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:45,080
like divine intervention.
50
00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:46,920
Well, almost.
51
00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:47,960
Here's how it actually works.
52
00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:50,040
When you type a prompt in co-pilot studio,
53
00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:53,720
say convert this CSV into an Excel report with a pie chart.
54
00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:56,200
The underlying large language model does two things.
55
00:01:56,200 --> 00:01:58,840
First, it writes a Python script to perform the task.
56
00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:01,560
Then instead of sending that code off to the cloud's wilderness,
57
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:03,640
it runs it inside a sealed sandbox.
58
00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:05,880
Think of it as a glass terrarium for Python.
59
00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,400
Alive, self-contained, but absolutely forbidden from climbing out.
60
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:11,640
All execution happens within that sandbox.
61
00:02:11,640 --> 00:02:13,560
It can read input files, transform them,
62
00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:15,720
calculate statistics, even draw charts.
63
00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:17,800
You get deterministic repeatable results
64
00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:19,800
because the code doesn't change between runs.
65
00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:21,640
It's generated once during testing,
66
00:02:21,640 --> 00:02:23,960
frozen, and re-executed consistently.
67
00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,920
No mysterious AI hallucinations, no inconsistent outputs,
68
00:02:26,920 --> 00:02:28,280
just reliable automation.
69
00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:30,840
But here's the governance twist most users ignore.
70
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:32,920
The feature is disabled by default.
71
00:02:32,920 --> 00:02:35,720
Administrators must explicitly enable code generation
72
00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,840
and execution in co-pilot inside the power platform admin center
73
00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:40,600
on a per-environment basis.
74
00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:41,080
Why?
75
00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:43,960
Because letting random users execute arbitrary code
76
00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,360
in corporate environments is minor detail,
77
00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:47,480
a potential catastrophe.
78
00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:51,000
Microsoft wisely forces admins to flip the switch intentionally.
79
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:52,600
So what exactly can it do when enabled?
80
00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:54,040
Quite a lot within its walls.
81
00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:55,880
You can use it for lightweight analytics,
82
00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,840
CSV to excel transformations, file conversions,
83
00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:00,440
or simple dataverse automation.
84
00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:02,760
It's impressive for tasks like cleaning data,
85
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:05,080
summarizing sales and generating visual reports,
86
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,960
or without leaving power automate or co-pilot studio.
87
00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:09,960
For analysts, this is revolutionary.
88
00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:12,200
No need for external scripts, task schedules,
89
00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:13,640
or deployed infrastructure.
90
00:03:13,640 --> 00:03:16,920
Naturally, the limitations arrive just as you start to enjoy yourself.
91
00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:18,120
The runtime is read only.
92
00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,160
No database writes except through permitted APIs.
93
00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:25,080
There's a 512 megabyte file cap, timeouts on longer executions,
94
00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:27,080
and a ban on external API calls,
95
00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:29,320
meaning no direct web requests, no pip installs,
96
00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:30,760
and no clever workarounds.
97
00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:32,600
It's a closed circuit, intentionally tame
98
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:35,720
to protect data integrity and prevent creative disasters.
99
00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,600
And yes, that frustrates developers who insist on infinite control,
100
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:39,800
but in truth, that's the point.
101
00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:43,160
The code interpreter democratizes Python for business users
102
00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,720
without handing them the keys to the data center.
103
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:48,360
It makes Python safe, like giving toddlers dull scissors.
104
00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:50,440
You can experiment, automate, and perform
105
00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:53,640
repeatable data prep, but you won't melt the firewall in the process.
106
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:55,480
In short, it's the friendliest Python runtime
107
00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:58,520
Microsoft has ever shipped, a sandbox for curiosity,
108
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:00,440
not a platform for pipelines.
109
00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:02,760
But once your ambitions exceed that little garden,
110
00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,240
when you start thinking about 10,000 records,
111
00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:09,000
nightly jobs, or integrations that stretch beyond Microsoft's walls,
112
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:10,600
you'll hit the fence fast.
113
00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:13,080
That's the moment when the instant ramen runs out
114
00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,640
and you realize you actually need a proper kitchen.
115
00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:17,720
And that kitchen, it's as your functions,
116
00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:20,120
as your functions, Python without training wheels.
117
00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:21,560
Now step out of the sandbox.
118
00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:24,760
Azure Functions is where Python stops pretending to be harmless.
119
00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,080
It's the same language, but now it's running with full access
120
00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:31,640
to real infrastructure, network endpoints, and production systems.
121
00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:33,640
Think of it as moving from a chemistry set
122
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,120
in your kitchen to a fully equipped laboratory,
123
00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,160
flammable materials, yes, but also protocols in ventilation.
124
00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:40,520
Here's the simplest definition.
125
00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:43,320
Azure Functions is Microsoft's serverless platform
126
00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:44,760
for running code on demand.
127
00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,160
You don't worry about servers, scaling, or maintenance.
128
00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:49,160
You write a Python function, deploy it,
129
00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:51,880
and Azure handles the rest, triggering your code
130
00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,200
whenever something happens, an HTTP request,
131
00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:56,360
a queue message, or a schedule timer.
132
00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:59,320
In Power Platform terms, it's the muscle behind the low code facade,
133
00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:01,160
your flow or PowerApp sensor request
134
00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:04,520
and the function executes precise, versioned logic.
135
00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:07,640
Architecturally, it's night and day compared to code interpreter.
136
00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:11,080
The code interpreter executes tiny Python snippets within a prompt,
137
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:13,480
stateless, context limited, and ephemeral.
138
00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:17,000
Azure Functions in contrast behaves like an event-driven microservice.
139
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:18,920
It can persist state externally
140
00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:21,240
fan out millions of concurrent executions
141
00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:24,040
and stay alive long enough to complete actual workloads.
142
00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:27,400
It's infrastructure without visible servers, hence serverless.
143
00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:29,960
Developers love it for one big reason, freedom.
144
00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:33,880
You can import Python packages, manage dependencies through requirements.
145
00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,200
TXT or use the new V2 programming model
146
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:37,960
which finally feels like standard Python
147
00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:39,640
instead of an exotic Azure dialect.
148
00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:41,640
You get proper version control, testing pipelines,
149
00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:43,240
and CI/CD integration.
150
00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:47,240
Small tweak, push to GitHub, trigger deployment, done.
151
00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:49,720
No mysterious prompts, no LLM interpretations,
152
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:51,960
just code running exactly as you wrote it.
153
00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,680
Security, meanwhile, stops being a passive checkbox
154
00:05:54,680 --> 00:05:56,920
and becomes an engineering discipline.
155
00:05:56,920 --> 00:05:59,160
Functions can use API keys for simple access,
156
00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:00,840
or ask for secure app calls,
157
00:06:00,840 --> 00:06:03,000
or managed identities that authenticate
158
00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:05,720
to other Azure resources without storing secrets.
159
00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:08,040
You can even wrap them inside virtual networks
160
00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,440
ensuring only internal services can call them.
161
00:06:10,440 --> 00:06:13,400
In enterprise terms, this is gold,
162
00:06:13,400 --> 00:06:16,200
auditable, enforceable, and fully logged.
163
00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:18,520
Scalability is the part that makes you blink.
164
00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:21,800
Azure Functions scales automatically from zero to infinity,
165
00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:25,160
or more precisely from idle to as many concurrent executions
166
00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:26,600
as your account allows.
167
00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:29,000
When no one calls your function, it sleeps.
168
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:32,280
When a thousand power automate flows invocate simultaneously,
169
00:06:32,280 --> 00:06:34,040
it wakes up a thousand times over.
170
00:06:34,040 --> 00:06:35,720
Each instance operates independently,
171
00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:37,240
then disappears when it's done.
172
00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,160
The billing meters only when it runs,
173
00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:41,240
so cost aligns perfectly with usage.
174
00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:42,920
Code interpreter can't do this.
175
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:46,600
It's fixed to a single execution window inside one chat session.
176
00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:49,880
Governance and monitoring are equally serious.
177
00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:52,440
In Azure, every function emits logs and metrics.
178
00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:54,200
You can view execution histories,
179
00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,240
exceptions, response times, and even memory footprints.
180
00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:59,640
Application insights and log analytics
181
00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:03,160
turn that data into dashboards that IT actually approves of.
182
00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:04,600
Compare that to code interpreter
183
00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,160
where your only audit trail is a chat history
184
00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,240
and a half-trustworthy output panel.
185
00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:10,920
One looks like enterprise IT,
186
00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:12,840
the other feels like science fair.
187
00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:14,040
Here's a practical example.
188
00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,560
Imagine an enterprise uploading gigabytes of sales data every day.
189
00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:19,640
A junior analyst might try running Python
190
00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:21,800
through code interpreter to clean and summarize it
191
00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:26,120
until the file limits max them in the phase at 512m by timeout.
192
00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:27,320
Failure, the same job,
193
00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:29,560
ported to an Azure function would stream chunks,
194
00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:31,000
process them concurrently,
195
00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:33,560
and finish before the analysts coffee cooled.
196
00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:35,480
The function doesn't panic, it scales.
197
00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:37,720
So why does anyone still cling to the code interpreter?
198
00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:39,000
Because it feels easier,
199
00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:42,280
its instant feedback, zero deployment, zero friction.
200
00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:44,760
But easy and appropriate aren't synonyms.
201
00:07:44,760 --> 00:07:46,520
Azure Functions demands discipline.
202
00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:49,000
You must define structure, handle secrets correctly,
203
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:50,440
and manage versions.
204
00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:52,360
Yet the payoff is professional reliability,
205
00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:54,440
code that isn't just clever but sustainable.
206
00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:57,560
In short, Azure Functions is Python without training wheels.
207
00:07:57,560 --> 00:07:59,640
It lets you integrate with APIs,
208
00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:00,760
automate at scale,
209
00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:03,480
and plug into enterprise systems responsibly.
210
00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:04,520
It's the grown-up choice,
211
00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:06,040
not as charming as a chat box,
212
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:07,560
but infinitely more capable.
213
00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,600
And yes, it solves the problem that no prompt ever will,
214
00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:13,560
consistency across every user, every environment, every run.
215
00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:16,760
So now that you've seen both ends of Microsoft's Python spectrum,
216
00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:19,160
sandboxed, playpen versus industrial kitchen,
217
00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:21,640
let's discuss the trap most teams fall into,
218
00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:23,640
confusing convenience for capability.
219
00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:26,840
The illusion of convenience,
220
00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:28,440
where most teams go wrong,
221
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:30,200
here's the tragedy of convenience.
222
00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:32,600
People think code interpreter means production Python.
223
00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:36,440
It doesn't, it means please don't bite the hand that feeds you.
224
00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:40,600
And yet every week someone drags a 400-mabbie CSV into Copilot Studio,
225
00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,960
hits run, and proudly declares they've automated data ingestion.
226
00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:46,840
Seconds later, timeout, then panic.
227
00:08:46,840 --> 00:08:48,360
Then a team's thread titled,
228
00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:49,720
why is Python broken?
229
00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:52,040
The core misunderstanding is architectural.
230
00:08:52,040 --> 00:08:54,360
Code interpreter isn't a data pipeline engine.
231
00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:56,760
It's a polite sandbox pretending to be one.
232
00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:59,080
It was designed for interactive transformations,
233
00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:01,240
clean this file, summarized that data set,
234
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:04,360
not sustained multi-step batch jobs that churn overnight,
235
00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:07,880
but many teams treated like an unlicensed copy of Azure Data Factory
236
00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:10,040
with predictably catastrophic results.
237
00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:11,240
Here's what actually happens.
238
00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,680
The sandbox spins up, runs your generated Python, and dies.
239
00:09:14,680 --> 00:09:17,720
That's it, no persistent environment, no retained context,
240
00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:18,840
no dependency management.
241
00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:20,680
You can't pip and store your favorite package,
242
00:09:20,680 --> 00:09:22,200
you can't allocate more RAM,
243
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,240
and you definitely can't call external APIs or databases
244
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,400
unless Microsoft pre-approves the endpoint.
245
00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:29,800
In short, it's hermetically sealed for safety,
246
00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,280
but users interpret safe as limitless.
247
00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:33,880
They stack logic on top of logic,
248
00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:35,400
chaining prompts, refeeding outputs
249
00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:36,920
like their debugging and notepad.
250
00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:39,800
Eventually performance plummets, sessions vanish,
251
00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:42,040
results disagree with yesterday's run.
252
00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:45,160
Then having learned nothing, someone decides to schedule it hourly.
253
00:09:45,160 --> 00:09:47,160
Brilliant, now they've industrialized failure.
254
00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:48,520
The illusion is economic too.
255
00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:51,880
It feels cheaper because it hides the cost behind licensing.
256
00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:53,320
Why spin up Azure resources?
257
00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:56,200
They argue when Python runs inside Power Platform already.
258
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:58,520
Yes, and why rent an apartment
259
00:09:58,520 --> 00:09:59,880
when you can live in a cardboard box?
260
00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:02,200
It's technically free, right up until it rains.
261
00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,840
Code interpreter was never built for sustained automation.
262
00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:07,720
Its runtime is metered, ephemeral, and capped by quotas
263
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:11,160
that exist precisely to prevent you from turning it into a data furnace.
264
00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:13,560
Meanwhile, real governance goes out the window.
265
00:10:13,560 --> 00:10:15,960
With Code interpreter, there's minimal telemetry,
266
00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:18,280
no application insights, no centralized logging,
267
00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:20,200
no immutable audit trail.
268
00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:23,800
When something fails, you get a vague error and a shrug.
269
00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:25,720
In enterprises, that's not automation.
270
00:10:25,720 --> 00:10:28,520
That's an untraceable incident waiting to happen.
271
00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:30,120
Compare that to Azure functions.
272
00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:33,000
Every execution logged, every exception traceable,
273
00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:34,440
every environment version.
274
00:10:34,440 --> 00:10:37,160
IT teams prefer it not because their joyless bureaucrats
275
00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:39,800
but because accountability is non-negotiable.
276
00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:42,840
You don't fix bugs by hoping the next prompt works better.
277
00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:46,280
You fix them by deploying tested code with continuous integration.
278
00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:47,400
And if you don't know what that is,
279
00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,840
congratulations, you've just discovered why your flow keeps breaking.
280
00:10:50,840 --> 00:10:53,000
Still, the seduction of convenience is strong.
281
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:55,480
Code interpreter delivers dopamine on demand,
282
00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:57,240
instant output, pretty charts,
283
00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:58,920
no infrastructure drama.
284
00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:00,600
People mistake that for maturity.
285
00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:03,480
But professional architecture isn't about how quickly you start working.
286
00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:07,080
It's about whether the thing still works six months later when you're on vacation.
287
00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:10,760
Azure functions is boring precisely because it survives turnover, migration,
288
00:11:10,760 --> 00:11:11,640
and human error.
289
00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:13,880
So keep using Code interpreter for what it is.
290
00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:17,240
An interactive assistant that makes analysts feel like developers.
291
00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,480
But don't ask it to run your nightly ETL,
292
00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:23,080
that's like expecting Excel macros to manage your supply chain.
293
00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:26,200
Convenience has a place, just not the one most team stick it.
294
00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:28,920
Use it to prototype test ideas or validate logic.
295
00:11:28,920 --> 00:11:30,280
Then when it matters,
296
00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:32,040
graduate to the grown-up environment.
297
00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:36,600
Otherwise, enjoy explaining to your administrator why your quick automation
298
00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:40,920
consumed half your tenant's compute quota, spoiler, they won't find it funny.
299
00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,720
The decision framework went to use which.
300
00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:45,640
Most people don't need another feature tour.
301
00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:46,680
They need a rulebook.
302
00:11:46,680 --> 00:11:49,160
So here it is, the sanity preserving framework
303
00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:52,280
that separates proper architecture from chatbot chaos.
304
00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:55,960
Think of this as the table your future self will print and tape above their monitor.
305
00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,040
Labelled when not to embarrass it.
306
00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:00,040
First rule, scope defines structure.
307
00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:04,200
Use Code interpreter when your task is immediate, local, and disposable.
308
00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:07,880
Use Azure functions when it's recurring, global, or business critical.
309
00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:10,600
Code interpreter thrives on singular moments,
310
00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:12,440
transforming a file for a meeting,
311
00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:15,640
running a one-off analysis, producing that coveted quick win.
312
00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:18,200
Azure functions by contrast lives for repeatability,
313
00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:19,720
integration, and scale.
314
00:12:19,720 --> 00:12:21,960
If it needs versioning, monitoring,
315
00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:23,800
or an owner with a job title,
316
00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:26,200
longer than enthusiast, it belongs in Azure.
317
00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:27,720
Governance is the next divide.
318
00:12:27,720 --> 00:12:30,440
The Code interpreter exists per environment,
319
00:12:30,440 --> 00:12:33,400
tucked inside co-pilot studio's safe boundaries.
320
00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:35,240
It's experimental, almost personal.
321
00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:38,360
Each environment must have the feature explicitly enabled by an admin.
322
00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:40,280
Think of it as sanctioned curiosity.
323
00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:43,080
Azure functions meanwhile is codified protocol,
324
00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:45,800
centrally controlled, policy enforced, and auditable
325
00:12:45,800 --> 00:12:47,560
through Azure Monitor or Sentinel.
326
00:12:47,560 --> 00:12:50,840
If your compliance officer can spell ISO,
327
00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:52,920
you already know which side they prefer.
328
00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:54,360
Security follows naturally.
329
00:12:54,360 --> 00:12:57,240
Code interpreter protects you from yourself through sealed sandboxes.
330
00:12:57,240 --> 00:12:58,600
It can touch files you upload,
331
00:12:58,600 --> 00:13:00,680
but not the internet beyond Microsoft's permits.
332
00:13:00,680 --> 00:13:04,120
No requests library, no browsing, no ex-filtration.
333
00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:05,960
Ideal for an analyst cleaning data,
334
00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:08,280
terrible for an integrator connecting to SAP.
335
00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:09,800
Azure functions flips that balance.
336
00:13:09,800 --> 00:13:11,640
It operates within managed identities,
337
00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:13,240
can sit inside virtual networks,
338
00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:15,080
and authenticate via OAuth.
339
00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:17,800
Secrets dwell in key vault, not inside prompts.
340
00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,880
So if you're asking, can I safely call an external API or database?
341
00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:24,440
The answer is yes, just not from the interpreter.
342
00:13:24,440 --> 00:13:26,920
Scalability is where the line becomes mathematical.
343
00:13:26,920 --> 00:13:28,840
The interpreter handles one session,
344
00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:30,680
singular synchronous human paste.
345
00:13:30,680 --> 00:13:33,240
It starts when you ask and ends when the output's done.
346
00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:36,360
Azure functions on the other hand is parallelism unleashed.
347
00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:38,520
It scales horizontally across tenants,
348
00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:40,920
bursts under load and waits politely when idle.
349
00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:43,000
If your workload could multiply,
350
00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:44,680
Azure functions will thrive.
351
00:13:44,680 --> 00:13:46,280
If it's just you watching it run,
352
00:13:46,280 --> 00:13:47,880
code interpreter is fine.
353
00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:49,720
Maintenance costs tell another story.
354
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:51,720
Code interpreter requires no pipelines,
355
00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:54,120
builds or dependency headaches just prompt tuning.
356
00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:57,160
But that simplicity evaporates once the logic grows.
357
00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,160
Prompts like true version control,
358
00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:02,440
one mistyped instruction and behavior mutates overnight.
359
00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:05,560
Azure functions anchors itself in Git or DevOps pipelines.
360
00:14:05,560 --> 00:14:08,840
Every commit, every deployment, every rollback is traceable.
361
00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:11,000
Bugs are documented since, not mysteries.
362
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:13,000
So when colleagues demand run the version
363
00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:15,160
we use last quarter, functions actually can.
364
00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:16,920
Now let's translate this into human roles.
365
00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:18,120
Picture two professionals,
366
00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:19,880
the analyst and the architect.
367
00:14:19,880 --> 00:14:22,200
The analyst lives in power, bi and Excel,
368
00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:25,240
obsessed with data transformations and visualization.
369
00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:27,000
Their job ends when inside appears.
370
00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,240
For them, code interpreter is ideal.
371
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:31,880
Generate Python snippets that summarize CSVs,
372
00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:35,000
produce visuals and send quick outputs in Copilot Studio.
373
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:36,760
Temporary, contained, effective.
374
00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:39,880
The architect however designs systems
375
00:14:39,880 --> 00:14:42,520
that must not explode when touched by power users.
376
00:14:42,520 --> 00:14:44,600
They think in tenant boundaries not CSVs.
377
00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:46,120
Their world involves pipelines,
378
00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:49,880
authentication flows and dependencies between half the company's services.
379
00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:51,960
For them, Azure functions is the obvious choice.
380
00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:53,400
They need predictable scaling,
381
00:14:53,400 --> 00:14:55,640
deployment pipelines and security compliance.
382
00:14:55,640 --> 00:14:58,760
The same code that the analyst tested casually in Copilot,
383
00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:00,840
the architect turns into a production API.
384
00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:02,840
That leads to my favorite hybrid pattern,
385
00:15:02,840 --> 00:15:04,840
the prototype to production loop.
386
00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:06,280
Start ideas in code interpreter.
387
00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:09,640
It's fast, no approval delays, no environment builds,
388
00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:11,240
just immediate feedback.
389
00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:14,120
Once the experiment stabilizes, say a data transformation prompt
390
00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:17,080
that consistently outputs the right schema, graduated.
391
00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:19,320
Take the generated Python, refine it,
392
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:21,000
push it to an Azure function
393
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:24,120
with proper error handling, environment variables and CI/CD.
394
00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:27,320
Congratulations, you've used both environments exactly as intended.
395
00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:29,320
The elegance of this pattern is it respects
396
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:31,400
scale and governance simultaneously.
397
00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:33,960
Code interpreter encourages innovation.
398
00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:36,120
Azure functions systematizes it.
399
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:39,000
One lowers the barrier, the other raises the standard.
400
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:40,680
Skipping either makes you inefficient,
401
00:15:40,680 --> 00:15:43,880
staying forever in the prompt renders your project unmanageable.
402
00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:47,000
Forcing every minor script into Azure's mother's agility.
403
00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:49,080
The trick is knowing when tinkering ends
404
00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:51,480
and engineering begins to summarize,
405
00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:53,160
though I hesitate to spoon feed.
406
00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:54,280
Code interpreter,
407
00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,520
exhaust disposable, interactive,
408
00:15:56,520 --> 00:15:57,880
governed by sandbox.
409
00:15:57,880 --> 00:16:00,280
Azure functions its persistent, reusable,
410
00:16:00,280 --> 00:16:01,880
governed by architecture.
411
00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:05,480
The arrogance of scale meets the humility of governance right here.
412
00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:07,320
Innovation demands the freedom to try,
413
00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:10,520
enterprise survival demands the discipline to systematize.
414
00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:13,320
Use the sandbox to think, the function to deliver,
415
00:16:13,320 --> 00:16:16,840
and stop pretending one tool can be both kitchen and microwave.
416
00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:19,800
If you follow that matrix, you won't just build faster.
417
00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:21,560
You'll finally build responsibly.
418
00:16:21,560 --> 00:16:24,280
The enterprise reality check.
419
00:16:24,280 --> 00:16:26,360
Governance, cost and control.
420
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:28,760
Let's talk about the part everyone claims to understand
421
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:30,040
but rarely enforces.
422
00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:31,320
Governance.
423
00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:32,920
When you bring Python into an enterprise,
424
00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:35,400
you don't just inherit power, you inherit accountability.
425
00:16:35,400 --> 00:16:37,160
Power platforms, code interpreter,
426
00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:39,560
gives users automation superpowers,
427
00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:42,200
but it also gives compliance officers night sweats.
428
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:43,640
That sandbox may look sealed,
429
00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:47,240
but every execution is still a code run inside corporate infrastructure.
430
00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:49,640
And with code comes risk, start with quotas.
431
00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:52,120
Microsoft didn't design limits just to be annoying.
432
00:16:52,120 --> 00:16:54,280
They exist to keep you from bankrupting your tenant.
433
00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:58,200
Each power platform environment caps file sizes at 512 bun,
434
00:16:58,200 --> 00:16:59,560
restricts sessions,
435
00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:01,800
and throttles daily power platform requests.
436
00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:05,000
Teams subscriptions get as few as 6000 per day.
437
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,640
Enterprise plans stretch higher but are still finite.
438
00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:09,080
Once a flow crosses that line,
439
00:17:09,080 --> 00:17:11,880
it fails silently or stalls until midnight.
440
00:17:11,880 --> 00:17:14,360
As your functions meanwhile couldn't care less about quotas,
441
00:17:14,360 --> 00:17:15,800
it scales with your wallet.
442
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:17,880
You pay by execution time and memory,
443
00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:19,720
but you define your thresholds,
444
00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:22,120
predictable spending replaces hidden throttles.
445
00:17:22,120 --> 00:17:23,720
Then there's the security posture.
446
00:17:23,720 --> 00:17:27,560
Code interpreter lives under the benevolent dictatorship of Microsoft's sandbox.
447
00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:29,320
It can't call external APIs,
448
00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:30,600
can't reach internet addresses
449
00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:32,600
and can't install malicious packages.
450
00:17:32,600 --> 00:17:35,560
That's good until your business process actually requires those things.
451
00:17:35,560 --> 00:17:38,680
One enthusiastic analyst decides to extend functionality
452
00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:43,000
with a custom prompt that passes financial data from an external endpoint
453
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:45,480
and suddenly governance alarms start shrieking.
454
00:17:45,480 --> 00:17:49,320
The sandbox intentionally forbids outbound connections to prevent data leakage.
455
00:17:49,320 --> 00:17:50,760
Every execution is logged yes,
456
00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:52,440
but only within that environment.
457
00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:56,040
There's no cross-tenant telemetry or SOT-friendly logging pipeline.
458
00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:59,320
Azure functions answers that limitation with luxuriant paranoia.
459
00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:01,960
It authenticates through managed identities
460
00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:06,440
and crypts everything in transit and can sit inside isolated virtual networks.
461
00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:07,720
Want to trace every call?
462
00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:11,560
Application insights documents them all with timestamps and payload metadata.
463
00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:15,560
IT departments sleep better knowing each request leaves a forensic footprint.
464
00:18:15,560 --> 00:18:17,640
Cost is another misunderstood dimension.
465
00:18:17,640 --> 00:18:21,720
Makeers often say code interpreter is free because it's included.
466
00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:24,760
Incorrect, it's prepaid under licensing big difference.
467
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:27,080
Each prompt consumes compute, storage,
468
00:18:27,080 --> 00:18:31,080
and network resources that contribute to your tenant's power platform capacity.
469
00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:34,760
Once demand spikes, administrators either pay for more capacity
470
00:18:34,760 --> 00:18:37,400
or start banning over enthusiastic creators.
471
00:18:37,400 --> 00:18:41,240
Azure functions conversely builds per execution and scales linearly.
472
00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:44,280
You use it, you pay for it, you stop the meter pauses.
473
00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:48,440
For structured workloads, think nightly ETL or batch reports this model wins.
474
00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:51,160
It converts chaos budgeting into predictable precision.
475
00:18:51,160 --> 00:18:53,080
Governance hierarchy completes the picture.
476
00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:56,600
Code interpreter is controlled through the power platform admin center
477
00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:57,960
toggled by environment.
478
00:18:57,960 --> 00:18:59,480
Its policy domain ends there.
479
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:03,160
Azure functions operates under Azure policy and role-based access control.
480
00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:06,840
That means you can restrict deployment by role and force tagging standards,
481
00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,960
demand encryption at rest, and audit configuration drift.
482
00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:12,360
When security teams perform internal reviews,
483
00:19:12,360 --> 00:19:15,320
functions survive scrutiny, chat prompts not so much.
484
00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:18,280
Picture a typical scenario.
485
00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:22,040
An internal audit discovers multiple co-pilot prompts executing financial
486
00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:24,600
data transformations with no centralized approval.
487
00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:26,680
The auditors trace logs half are missing.
488
00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:30,280
The admin panics and disables code execution across environments overnight.
489
00:19:30,280 --> 00:19:31,480
Everything stops working.
490
00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:35,960
Q frantic teams messages from analysts who build half their reporting stack in prompts.
491
00:19:35,960 --> 00:19:38,360
Compare that with the Azure functions approach.
492
00:19:38,360 --> 00:19:41,720
Code repositories, version releases, and monitoring dashboards.
493
00:19:41,720 --> 00:19:46,440
The same auditors request evidence and IT produces a neat pipeline diagram,
494
00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:49,160
execution logs, and policy compliance reports.
495
00:19:49,160 --> 00:19:52,360
One side looks experimental, the other, institutional.
496
00:19:52,360 --> 00:19:54,440
The moral isn't to abandon code interpreter.
497
00:19:54,440 --> 00:19:56,040
It's to understand its border.
498
00:19:56,040 --> 00:19:59,720
It's perfect for ideation and testing, but when real money, compliance,
499
00:19:59,720 --> 00:20:02,200
or customer data touch the code, you promote it.
500
00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:04,040
Hybrid best practice.
501
00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,600
Prototype in the sandbox, deploy in Azure.
502
00:20:06,600 --> 00:20:09,320
That pattern satisfies both creativity and control.
503
00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:12,120
A spark in co-pilot becomes an approved microservice with provenance,
504
00:20:12,120 --> 00:20:13,720
telemetry, and a life cycle.
505
00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,280
Because power without structure isn't innovation,
506
00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,720
it's entropy and enterprises have enough of that already.
507
00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:20,760
Stop the misuse.
508
00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:22,600
So here's the line in the silicon.
509
00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:25,000
Code interpreter is a phenomenal sandbox.
510
00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:28,040
A safe place for experimentation, small automations,
511
00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:30,760
and quick insights inside co-pilot studio.
512
00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:33,160
It democratizes Python without dismantling compliance,
513
00:20:33,160 --> 00:20:36,200
but it's not under any interpretation a production platform.
514
00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:38,840
Azure functions on the other hand is your Python backbone,
515
00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:41,480
governed, auditable, and ruthlessly scalable.
516
00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:43,560
Using the wrong one isn't just inefficient.
517
00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:46,760
It insults the architecture your organization pays to maintain.
518
00:20:46,760 --> 00:20:51,160
Running batch pipelines in a conversational agent is like towing a trailer with a bicycle.
519
00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:53,560
It moves technically, but only until the axle snaps.
520
00:20:53,560 --> 00:20:56,680
Enterprise reliability comes from separation of intent.
521
00:20:56,680 --> 00:21:00,120
Prototype where it's cheap, deploy, where it's controlled.
522
00:21:00,120 --> 00:21:02,840
So stop feeding heavy workloads into code interpreter
523
00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:04,360
and calling it automation.
524
00:21:04,360 --> 00:21:07,000
Start using Azure functions for what it was built to do.
525
00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:11,080
Secure, versioned, repeatable logic that survives you going on holiday.
526
00:21:11,080 --> 00:21:13,560
Your admins will thank you, your audit logs will thank you,
527
00:21:13,560 --> 00:21:16,120
and remarkably your code will still work next quarter.
528
00:21:16,120 --> 00:21:18,680
If this saved you time or rescued your sanity,
529
00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:20,600
repay the debt, subscribe,
530
00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:22,680
tap follow, enable notifications,
531
00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:25,480
and let the next update arrive like a scheduled task.
532
00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:27,720
on time 0 drama. Do the efficient thing now.