The Security Intern Is Now A Terminator

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.279
Meet your new intern, doesn't sleep, doesn't complain, doesn't spill

2
00:00:03.279 --> 00:00:06.440
coffee into the server rack, and just casually replaced half

3
00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:09.439
your security operations center's workload in a week. This intern

4
00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:11.759
isn't a person, of course, It's a synthetic analyst, an

5
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:16.120
autonomous agent from Microsoft's Security Copilot ecosystem, and it never

6
00:00:16.199 --> 00:00:18.280
asks for a day off. If you've worked in Associate,

7
00:00:18.280 --> 00:00:21.399
you already know the story. Humans drowning in noise. Every

8
00:00:21.519 --> 00:00:24.839
endpoint pings, every user sneeze, triggers a log, most of

9
00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:28.000
it falls, all of it demanding review. Meanwhile, every real

10
00:00:28.039 --> 00:00:30.960
attack is buried under a landfill of possible events. That's

11
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:34.880
not vigilance. That's punishment disguised as productivity. Microsoft decided to

12
00:00:34.920 --> 00:00:39.079
automate the punishment. Intersecurity Copilot agents miniature digital twins of

13
00:00:39.119 --> 00:00:42.359
your best analysts, purpose built to think in context, make

14
00:00:42.439 --> 00:00:46.240
decisions autonomously. And this is the unerving part improve as

15
00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:49.079
you correct them. They're not scripts. They're coworkers, co workers

16
00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:51.719
with synthetic patients and the ability to read a thousand

17
00:00:51.759 --> 00:00:54.439
alerts per second without blinking. We're about to meet three

18
00:00:54.479 --> 00:00:57.560
of these new hires. Agent one hunts phishing emails. No

19
00:00:57.640 --> 00:01:02.119
more analyst marathons through overflowing inboxes. Agent two handles conditional

20
00:01:02.119 --> 00:01:05.920
access chaos, rewriting identity policy before your auditors even notice

21
00:01:05.959 --> 00:01:10.480
a gap. Agent three patches vulnerabilities quietly prepping deployments while

22
00:01:10.519 --> 00:01:13.760
humans argue about severity. Together they form a kind of

23
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:18.359
robotic operations team, one scanning your messages, one guarding your doors,

24
00:01:18.680 --> 00:01:22.359
one applying digital bandages to infected systems. And like any

25
00:01:22.359 --> 00:01:26.159
over eager intern, they're learning frighteningly fast. Humans made them

26
00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:29.000
to help, but in teaching them how we secure systems,

27
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:31.200
we also taught them how to think about defense. That's

28
00:01:31.239 --> 00:01:33.000
why by the end of this video you'll see how

29
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:35.959
these agents compress so see chaos into something manageable and

30
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:38.319
maybe a little unsettling. But the question isn't whether they'll

31
00:01:38.359 --> 00:01:40.719
lighten your workload. They already have. The question is how

32
00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:43.959
long before you report to them. The era of synthetic analysts.

33
00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:47.400
Security operations centers didn't fail because analysts were lazy. They

34
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:51.480
failed because complexity outgrew the species. Every modern enterprise floods

35
00:01:51.480 --> 00:01:55.439
its SEC with millions of events daily. Each event demands attention,

36
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:58.519
but only a handful actually matter, and picking out those

37
00:01:58.599 --> 00:02:01.120
view is like performing CPR on a haystack, hoping one

38
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:04.599
straw coughs. Manual triage worked when logs fit on one monitor.

39
00:02:05.120 --> 00:02:08.000
Then came cloud sprawl, hybrid identities, and a tsunami of

40
00:02:08.080 --> 00:02:12.039
false positives. Analysts burned out. Response times stretched from hours

41
00:02:12.039 --> 00:02:15.960
to days. Secs became reaction machines, collecting noise faster than

42
00:02:15.960 --> 00:02:19.479
they could act. Traditional automation was supposed to fix that spoiler.

43
00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:23.639
It didn't. Those old school scripts are calculators. They follow

44
00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:26.479
formulas but never ask why they trigger the same playbook

45
00:02:26.520 --> 00:02:29.919
every time, no matter the context. Useful, yes, but rigid

46
00:02:30.039 --> 00:02:33.479
agentic AI. What drives Security Copilot's new era is different.

47
00:02:33.599 --> 00:02:36.000
Think of it like this. The calculator just does math.

48
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:39.479
The intern with intuition decides which math to do. Copilot

49
00:02:39.479 --> 00:02:44.120
agents perceive patterns, reason across data, and act autonomously within

50
00:02:44.159 --> 00:02:47.639
your policies. They don't just execute orders. They interpret intent.

51
00:02:47.879 --> 00:02:49.919
You give them the goal and they plan the steps.

52
00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:54.080
Why this matters. Analysts spend roughly seventy percent of their

53
00:02:54.120 --> 00:02:57.960
time proving alerts aren't threats. That's seven of every ten

54
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:02.759
work hours verifying ghosts. Security Copilot's autonomous agents eliminate around

55
00:03:02.840 --> 00:03:05.680
ninety percent of that busy work by filtering false alarms

56
00:03:05.680 --> 00:03:08.520
before human ever looks. An agent doesn't tire after the

57
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:11.680
first hundred alerts. It doesn't degrade in judgment by our

58
00:03:11.719 --> 00:03:14.080
twelve if it doesn't miss lunch because it never needed one.

59
00:03:14.199 --> 00:03:17.080
And here's where it gets deviously efficient feedback loops. You

60
00:03:17.159 --> 00:03:20.439
correct the agent once it remembers forever, no retraining cycles,

61
00:03:20.520 --> 00:03:23.599
no repeated briefings feeded one. This alert was benign, and

62
00:03:23.639 --> 00:03:26.960
it rewires its reasoning for next time. One human correction

63
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:32.800
scales into permanent institutional memory. Now multiply that memory across Defender, Purview, Entra,

64
00:03:32.919 --> 00:03:36.080
and in Tune, the entire Microsoft security suite sprouting tiny

65
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:41.520
autonomous specialists. Defenders agents investigate fishing, Pervius handle insider risk, entrust,

66
00:03:41.560 --> 00:03:45.199
audit access policies in real time in Tune's remediate vulnerabilities

67
00:03:45.240 --> 00:03:47.680
before they're on your radar. The architecture is like a

68
00:03:47.680 --> 00:03:51.599
nervous system. Signals from every limb, reflexes, firing instantly, brain

69
00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:55.560
centralized in copilot. The irony scs once hired armies of

70
00:03:55.560 --> 00:03:58.759
analysts to handle alert volume. Now they deploy agents to

71
00:03:58.800 --> 00:04:01.680
supervise those same analysts. Humans went from defining rules to

72
00:04:01.719 --> 00:04:04.400
approving scripts to mentoring AI interns that no longer need

73
00:04:04.439 --> 00:04:07.719
constant guidance. Everything changed at the moment machine reasoning became

74
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:11.360
context aware. In rule based automation, context kills the system

75
00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:14.439
too many branches, too much logic maintenance. In agentic AI,

76
00:04:14.719 --> 00:04:17.439
context feeds the system, it adapts paths on the fly,

77
00:04:17.879 --> 00:04:20.000
and yes, that means the agent learns faster than the

78
00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:23.240
average human. Correction number one hundred sticks just as firmly

79
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:26.040
as correction number one. Unlike Steve from night shift, it

80
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:29.319
doesn't forget by Monday. The result is a SoC that

81
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:33.000
shifts from reaction to anticipation. Humans stop fire fighting and

82
00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:37.000
start overseeing strategy. Alerts get resolved while you're still sipping coffee,

83
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:40.000
and investigations run on loop even after your shift ends.

84
00:04:40.120 --> 00:04:44.120
The cost some pride analysts must adapt to supervising intelligence

85
00:04:44.160 --> 00:04:47.399
that doesn't burn out, complain, or misinterpret policies. The benefit

86
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:49.920
a twenty four hour defense grid that gets smarter every

87
00:04:49.959 --> 00:04:52.040
time you tell it what it missed. So yes, the

88
00:04:52.040 --> 00:04:54.879
security in turn evolved. It stopped fetching logs and started

89
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:57.360
demanding data sets. Let's meet the first one It doesn't

90
00:04:57.399 --> 00:05:01.199
check your email. It interrogates it. Fishing triarch agent killing

91
00:05:01.240 --> 00:05:04.519
alert fatigue. Every sec has the same morning ritual. Open

92
00:05:04.560 --> 00:05:08.040
the queue, see hundreds of suspicious email alerts, sigh deeply,

93
00:05:08.160 --> 00:05:11.439
and start playing cyber roulette. Ninety of those reports will

94
00:05:11.439 --> 00:05:14.759
be harmless newsletters or holiday discounts. Five might be genuine

95
00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:17.959
phishing attempts. The other five, best case, are your coworkers

96
00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:21.920
forwarding memes to the security inbox. Human analysts slock through

97
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:25.360
these one by one, cross referencing headers, scanning URL's, validating

98
00:05:25.399 --> 00:05:29.920
sender reputation. It's exhausting, repetitive, and utterly unsustainable. The human

99
00:05:29.920 --> 00:05:32.839
brain wasn't designed to digest thousands of nearly identical panic

100
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:36.160
messages per day. Alert fatigue isn't a metaphor. It's an

101
00:05:36.199 --> 00:05:40.279
occupational hazard. Enter the fishing triarche agent. Instead of being

102
00:05:40.279 --> 00:05:43.720
passively sent reports, this agent interrogates every email as if

103
00:05:43.759 --> 00:05:47.120
it were the world's most meticulous detective. It passes the message,

104
00:05:47.160 --> 00:05:50.600
checks linked domains, evaluate sender behavior, and correlates with real

105
00:05:50.639 --> 00:05:53.680
time thread signals from defender. Then it decides on its

106
00:05:53.720 --> 00:05:57.319
own whether the email deserves escalation. Here's the twist. The

107
00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:00.240
agent doesn't just apply rules, It reasons in context. If

108
00:06:00.279 --> 00:06:02.800
a vendor suddenly sends an invoice from an unusual domain,

109
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:07.279
older systems would flag it automatically. Security Copilot's agent, however,

110
00:06:07.399 --> 00:06:12.160
weighs recent correspondence patterns, authentication results, and content tone before

111
00:06:12.199 --> 00:06:16.720
concluding it's The difference between seems odd and is definitely malicious.

112
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:21.000
Consider a tiny experiment. A human analyst gets two alerts.

113
00:06:21.399 --> 00:06:25.920
Subject line contains payment pending. One email comes from a

114
00:06:25.920 --> 00:06:29.040
regular partner, the other from a domain off by one letter.

115
00:06:29.279 --> 00:06:33.240
The analyst will investigate both painstakingly. The agent meanwhile handles

116
00:06:33.279 --> 00:06:36.839
them simultaneously, runs telemetry, checks spots the domain spoof, closes

117
00:06:36.839 --> 00:06:39.680
the safe one, escalates the thread, and drafts its rational,

118
00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:43.519
all before the human finishes reading the first header. This

119
00:06:43.560 --> 00:06:47.079
is where natural language feedback changes everything. When an analyst

120
00:06:47.120 --> 00:06:50.839
intervenes typing, this is harmless. The agent absorbs that correction.

121
00:06:51.000 --> 00:06:55.079
It reprioritizes similar alerts automatically next time. The learning isn't

122
00:06:55.120 --> 00:06:59.639
generalized guesswork. It's specific reasoning, tuned to your environment, your building,

123
00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:03.160
collected memory, one dismissal at a time. Transparency matters, of course,

124
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:06.600
no black box verdicts The agent generates a visual workflow

125
00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:11.279
showing each reasoning step, DNS lookups, header anomalies, reputation scores,

126
00:07:11.319 --> 00:07:14.480
even its decision confidence. Analysts can re enact its thinking

127
00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:17.399
like a replay its accountability by design, and the results

128
00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:20.800
early deployments show up to ninety percent fewer manual investigations

129
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:23.560
for fishing alerts, with meantime to validate dropping from hours

130
00:07:23.560 --> 00:07:27.240
to minutes, analysts spend more time on genuine incidents instead

131
00:07:27.240 --> 00:07:30.480
of debating whether quarterly update PDF is planning a heist.

132
00:07:30.600 --> 00:07:34.079
Productivity metrics improve not because people work harder, but because

133
00:07:34.120 --> 00:07:37.920
they finally stop wasting effort proving the sky isn't falling. Psychologically,

134
00:07:37.920 --> 00:07:40.759
that's a big deal. Alert fatigue doesn't just waste time,

135
00:07:40.879 --> 00:07:45.360
it corrodes morale. Removing the noise restores focus. Analysts actually

136
00:07:45.399 --> 00:07:49.160
feel competent again, rather than chronically overwhelmed. The fishing triage

137
00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:52.759
agent becomes the calm, sleepless colleague, quietly cleaning the inbox

138
00:07:52.839 --> 00:07:55.720
chaos before anyone looks in. Basically, this interurn reads ten

139
00:07:55.759 --> 00:07:58.319
thousand emails a day and never asks for coffee. It

140
00:07:58.360 --> 00:08:01.759
doesn't glance at memes, doesn't miss judge sarcasm. And doesn't

141
00:08:01.759 --> 00:08:04.639
forward chain letters to the CFO, just in case. It

142
00:08:04.759 --> 00:08:08.600
just works relentlessly, consistently, boringly well behind the sarcasm hides

143
00:08:08.639 --> 00:08:12.759
a fundamental shift detection isn't about endless human vigilance anymore.

144
00:08:12.759 --> 00:08:16.680
It's about teaching a machine to approximate your vigilance, refine it,

145
00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:20.959
then exceeded. Every correction you make today becomes institutional wisdom tomorrow.

146
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:24.639
Every decision compounds, so your inbox stays clean, your analysts

147
00:08:24.759 --> 00:08:28.199
stay sane, and your genuine threats finally get their moment

148
00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:31.439
of undivided attention. And if this, in turn handles your inbox,

149
00:08:31.639 --> 00:08:35.639
the next one manages your doors. Conditional access optimization agent

150
00:08:36.120 --> 00:08:40.000
closing access gaps. Identity management the digital equivalent of herding

151
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:43.279
cats armed with key cards. Every organization thinks it's nailed

152
00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:46.600
access control until a forgotten contractor account shows up signing

153
00:08:46.600 --> 00:08:50.600
into confidential systems months after their project ended. Human admins

154
00:08:50.639 --> 00:08:53.600
eventually catch it, usually during an audit, usually by accident.

155
00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:56.639
By then, the risk has already taken up. Residence access

156
00:08:56.679 --> 00:09:00.360
sprawl is what happens when temporary permissions become permanent and

157
00:09:00.440 --> 00:09:04.159
manual audits pretend otherwise. It's not negligence. It's math thousands

158
00:09:04.200 --> 00:09:07.039
of users, hundreds of apps, constant role changes. You need

159
00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:09.919
vigilance that never sleeps, in memory, that never fades. That's

160
00:09:09.960 --> 00:09:13.159
the problem Microsoft aimed squarely at with the Conditional Access

161
00:09:13.159 --> 00:09:16.000
Optimization agent inside ENTRA. Think of it as an obsessive

162
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:19.480
doorman who checks every badge every night without complaining about overtime.

163
00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:23.679
Here's how it works. The agent continuously scans your directory, users, devices,

164
00:09:23.720 --> 00:09:27.279
service principles, group memberships, cross checking each against your conditional

165
00:09:27.320 --> 00:09:30.600
access policies. It looks for drift, a user added to

166
00:09:30.600 --> 00:09:33.480
the wrong group, a device that lost compliance, or an

167
00:09:33.519 --> 00:09:36.840
app by passing multi factor authentication. When it spots misalignment,

168
00:09:36.879 --> 00:09:39.480
it flags it instantly and proposes corrections in plain English.

169
00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:44.480
Require MFA for these five accounts, remove inactive service principles,

170
00:09:44.960 --> 00:09:48.480
add these new users to baseline protection. You can approve

171
00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:51.120
or modify the suggestions with a single click, or even

172
00:09:51.159 --> 00:09:55.200
phrase your decision conversationally. Yes, enforce MFA for admins only.

173
00:09:55.720 --> 00:09:58.600
The system adapts. Compare that to the human process. A

174
00:09:58.639 --> 00:10:02.320
traditional access review might take hours dumping export lists, running

175
00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:06.080
PowerShell queries, reconciling permissions, then scheduling cleanup by the time

176
00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:08.840
it's approved, half the data's outdated. The agent, on the

177
00:10:08.879 --> 00:10:12.240
other hand, runs continuously. The window between exposure and correction

178
00:10:12.279 --> 00:10:15.559
shrinks from days to moments. Take a mundane example, a

179
00:10:15.559 --> 00:10:18.679
contractor hired for a three month engagement never removed from

180
00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:22.679
privileged groups. Ninety days later, the agent notices zero sign ins,

181
00:10:22.919 --> 00:10:26.840
zero activity logs, yet continued high risk permissions. It surfaces

182
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:31.720
a polite notification, recommend review account shows inactivity exceeding policy threshold.

183
00:10:31.960 --> 00:10:34.519
You accept it, updates policies and logs the rationale for

184
00:10:34.559 --> 00:10:38.000
audit clear, tidy, compliant, all before your next coffee break.

185
00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:41.679
What this actually enables is continuous zero trust. Hygiene policies

186
00:10:41.679 --> 00:10:46.720
aren't static anymore. They breathe as your environment changes, new projects, mergers,

187
00:10:46.759 --> 00:10:51.159
remote hires. The agent adjusts conditional access boundaries, automatically aligning

188
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:55.200
protection with reality instead of documentation dreams. From a compliance perspective,

189
00:10:55.240 --> 00:10:59.200
that's gold. Every recommendation, every accepted change, every skipped suggestion

190
00:10:59.320 --> 00:11:02.399
is logged. When regulators ask for proof of enforcement. You

191
00:11:02.399 --> 00:11:05.440
don't scramble, you scroll. Your audit trail is built by

192
00:11:05.480 --> 00:11:11.440
a machine that never forgets business impact. Twofold first privileged creep,

193
00:11:11.759 --> 00:11:16.080
the slow silent. Inflation of access rights drops dramatically. The

194
00:11:16.159 --> 00:11:19.320
agent prunes excess before it blossoms into a breach. Second

195
00:11:19.519 --> 00:11:25.600
operations gain consistency, Humans vary. Automation doesn't. Policies stay coherent

196
00:11:25.679 --> 00:11:28.559
even as your IT staff rotates. Its governance as a

197
00:11:28.600 --> 00:11:31.519
service enforced by something that reads faster than auditors and

198
00:11:31.600 --> 00:11:35.080
never confuses similar usernames. So yes, this digital doorman inspects

199
00:11:35.120 --> 00:11:38.720
everyone's keys nightly. It doesn't gossip, doesn't panic, just reruns

200
00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:42.360
policy evaluations with priestly devotion. When someone leaves the company,

201
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:45.360
the agent ensures their token follows them out. When a

202
00:11:45.399 --> 00:11:49.320
new department forms, it reviews group scopes before any assumption's metastasize.

203
00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:53.320
That translates directly into reduced administrative overhead and measurable risk reduction.

204
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:58.039
Analysts don't drown in permission spreadsheets. They supervise Rasional over

205
00:11:58.120 --> 00:12:02.200
Permitted accounts vanish like wildl after a census. Compliance reviews

206
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:06.200
become confirmations instead of quests. In essence, security posture moves

207
00:12:06.200 --> 00:12:09.440
from episodic audit to perpetual enforcement. You stop cleaning up

208
00:12:09.440 --> 00:12:11.200
twice a year and start living in a state of

209
00:12:11.240 --> 00:12:14.600
real time alignment. One agent guards your inbox. This one

210
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:17.679
guards your walls and adjusts the bricks whenever the building shifts.

211
00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:21.279
So one agent guards your walls, another patches the cracks.

212
00:12:22.120 --> 00:12:26.440
Vulnerability remediation agent automating defense healing. Ask any IT admin

213
00:12:26.440 --> 00:12:30.159
about patching, and watch the involuntary twitch. Vulnerability management used

214
00:12:30.159 --> 00:12:33.519
to mean spreadsheets, email chains, and frantic patch tuesdays that

215
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:37.279
felt more like patch nightmares. You'd read advisories, rank priorities,

216
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.960
negotiate maintenance windows, then pray nothing broke in production. It's

217
00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:44.200
a ritual built on caffeine, chaos, and crossed fingers. Enter

218
00:12:44.240 --> 00:12:47.679
the vulnerability Remediation agent inside Microsoft in tunes. Think of

219
00:12:47.720 --> 00:12:50.879
it as the medic in your digital hospital, constantly checking vitals,

220
00:12:50.919 --> 00:12:54.840
identifying infections, and prepping treatment plans long before human doctors arrive.

221
00:12:55.360 --> 00:12:58.360
It doesn't replace the cybersecurity team, it prevents them from

222
00:12:58.360 --> 00:13:01.200
collapsing under a mountain of cvees. Here's what the agent

223
00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:05.519
actually does. It continuously ingests vulnerability feeds, including CV databases

224
00:13:05.519 --> 00:13:08.639
and Microsoft's own threat intelligence, cross referencing them with your

225
00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:12.200
current device configurations. When a new vulnerability appears, it doesn't

226
00:13:12.240 --> 00:13:16.519
just scream critical like an alarmist RSS feed, It calculates exposure,

227
00:13:16.720 --> 00:13:20.480
which devices are affected, what configurations matter, and whether exploit

228
00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:23.600
code is already circulating in the wild. Then it prioritizes.

229
00:13:23.639 --> 00:13:25.600
You don't get a paniclist, you get a surgical plan.

230
00:13:25.879 --> 00:13:28.559
Say a critical osflow surfaces at two a m. The

231
00:13:28.600 --> 00:13:32.240
agent automatically maps it against your managed endpoints. It identifies

232
00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:36.039
vulnerable bills, checks patch availability, and stages the deployment workflow

233
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:38.840
without human intervention. When you log in the next morning,

234
00:13:38.919 --> 00:13:43.039
the situation brief is waiting twenty seven devices require patch

235
00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:47.279
KB one twenty three test deployment ready. No spreadsheets, no

236
00:13:47.399 --> 00:13:51.240
manual reconciliation, no existential dread. The real gain isn't just speed,

237
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:55.600
its continuity. Human patch schedules follow calendars, threads follow physics.

238
00:13:55.679 --> 00:13:58.159
The agent closes that mismatch by functioning as a rolling

239
00:13:58.159 --> 00:14:02.120
assessment engine. Every new TV triggers automatic re evaluation of

240
00:14:02.159 --> 00:14:05.519
the entire device fleet. The moment a risk emerges, remediation

241
00:14:05.600 --> 00:14:08.799
planning starts. By the time most administrators are crafting an

242
00:14:08.840 --> 00:14:12.240
email about impact, half the remediation work is already automated

243
00:14:12.240 --> 00:14:15.559
and cute for approval. In technical terms, meantime to patch

244
00:14:15.639 --> 00:14:19.320
shrinks dramatically up to thirty percent faster across pilot deployments,

245
00:14:19.320 --> 00:14:23.000
according to Microsoft's internal Metrics translation, you spend less time

246
00:14:23.039 --> 00:14:26.240
being reactive and more time preventing the next breach headline.

247
00:14:26.360 --> 00:14:28.759
Even the deployment plan is polite, The agent weighs risk

248
00:14:28.799 --> 00:14:32.320
severity against operational disruption. If a patch might reboot sensitive

249
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:36.200
systems during production hours, it recommends staged rollout rather than

250
00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:39.480
blind enforcement. There's a strange elegance in watching a machine

251
00:14:39.519 --> 00:14:43.039
demonstrate better judgment than a change management committee and transparency.

252
00:14:43.080 --> 00:14:46.360
Every recommendation comes with reasoning which CV triggered it, which

253
00:14:46.399 --> 00:14:50.360
telemetry confirmed posture, which mitigating controls already reduce exposure. You

254
00:14:50.399 --> 00:14:52.679
don't have to trust it blindly. You can audit its

255
00:14:52.720 --> 00:14:55.480
thought process like a colleague's notes. Think of your environment

256
00:14:55.480 --> 00:14:59.399
as a body. Old security models waited for fever, intrusions, outages,

257
00:14:59.480 --> 00:15:03.080
visible simil stems before treating the illness. The vulnerability remediation

258
00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:07.440
agent acts like an immune system. It scans, constantly, identifies anomalies,

259
00:15:07.519 --> 00:15:11.919
and applies digital antibodies before infection spreads. Defense becomes proactive

260
00:15:11.960 --> 00:15:15.679
maintenance instead of post mortem investigation. The fascinating part is

261
00:15:15.679 --> 00:15:19.360
how these autonomous medics collaborate with other agents. The phishing

262
00:15:19.360 --> 00:15:22.919
triarche intern prevents new infections from arriving by email. The

263
00:15:22.960 --> 00:15:27.080
access optimization doorman ensures only clean identities enter. The remediation

264
00:15:27.159 --> 00:15:31.039
medic heals exposed surfaces. Together, they approximate a biological organism,

265
00:15:31.320 --> 00:15:34.919
a SoC that self regulates, self protects, and occasionally self

266
00:15:34.960 --> 00:15:38.759
scolds for missed updates. Of course, humans still dictate priorities.

267
00:15:39.279 --> 00:15:43.039
You decide whether to approve patches automatically for low impact

268
00:15:43.080 --> 00:15:47.279
devices or stage them for validation. The agent doesn't usurp authority.

269
00:15:47.519 --> 00:15:50.879
It just performs triache faster than any human. Refuse its

270
00:15:50.879 --> 00:15:53.039
help if you like. But remember the last time someone

271
00:15:53.080 --> 00:15:56.679
postponed patching, half the network caught ransomware. So yes, call

272
00:15:56.759 --> 00:15:59.399
it the intern turned field surgeon. While everyone else debates

273
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:03.000
risk scoring, it's already cleaning sutures and scheduling operating rooms.

274
00:16:03.080 --> 00:16:06.879
That thirty percent improvement figure isn't marketing, it's statistical mercy,

275
00:16:07.240 --> 00:16:10.960
less downtime, fewer breaches, and analysts sleeping through what used

276
00:16:11.000 --> 00:16:15.080
to be three AMS emergency calls. Now that we've met

277
00:16:15.120 --> 00:16:17.799
the factory trained models, let's discuss the next sleap teaching

278
00:16:17.840 --> 00:16:21.440
you to build one of your own, building autonomous security agents.

279
00:16:21.679 --> 00:16:24.679
Security Copilot's agent builder is frankly the part where things

280
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.879
get delightfully unsettling, because once you can create your own

281
00:16:27.919 --> 00:16:31.240
digital analysts, you're not managing a security product anymore. You're

282
00:16:31.279 --> 00:16:34.679
staffing a synthetic workforce. At its simplest, the agent builder

283
00:16:34.759 --> 00:16:38.440
lets you describe a task in plain English, monitor privileged

284
00:16:38.480 --> 00:16:41.720
sign ins outside business hours, and alert me if tokens

285
00:16:41.759 --> 00:16:46.639
originate from unmanaged devices. Copilot translates that into operational logic.

286
00:16:47.159 --> 00:16:49.679
The result a custom agent deployed inside your Microsoft three

287
00:16:49.759 --> 00:16:53.600
sixty five environment, waiting patiently for midnight sheenanigans. You're no

288
00:16:53.639 --> 00:16:57.519
longer writing scripts your authoring behavior. Each agent can call tools,

289
00:16:57.720 --> 00:17:02.240
query data, analyze results, and act event based triggers, continuous scans,

290
00:17:02.320 --> 00:17:06.440
or scheduled routines. It's like constructing another intern, perfectly obedient,

291
00:17:06.519 --> 00:17:10.519
eternally caffeinated, incapable of sarcasm safety. First, of course, every

292
00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:13.160
agent runs under an isolated identity with its own permissions

293
00:17:13.160 --> 00:17:15.640
and auditlog Think of it as issuing each one a

294
00:17:15.640 --> 00:17:18.440
personal badge instead of your admin hearing. You can revoke

295
00:17:18.559 --> 00:17:20.559
or restrict it at any time, and every decision it

296
00:17:20.559 --> 00:17:24.720
makes is traceable in zero trust terms. That's autonomy with accountability,

297
00:17:24.799 --> 00:17:28.079
a rare combination even among humans. The flexibility is startling.

298
00:17:28.359 --> 00:17:32.279
Want an agent that summarizes daily security posture across Defender

299
00:17:32.319 --> 00:17:35.960
and Purview sensor teams, update and ques patch deployment suggestions.

300
00:17:36.240 --> 00:17:40.039
You can want another that correlates signing anomalies with geographic patterns,

301
00:17:40.240 --> 00:17:44.400
then recommends conditional access updates automatically. Also possible. The library

302
00:17:44.400 --> 00:17:48.119
of partner tools extends capabilities further, letting organizations chain intelligence

303
00:17:48.119 --> 00:17:51.240
from multiple sources like orchestral instruments, following a common tempo.

304
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:55.240
This changes the culture of work. Assistance stop being subordinates.

305
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:59.160
They become collaborators. Analysts design oversight frameworks instead of living

306
00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:03.000
in spreadsheets. The copilot ecosystem evolves into a matter organization,

307
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:06.400
humans managing abstractions of themselves. There's humor in that. You

308
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:09.680
don't hire entry level analysts anymore. You compile them, then

309
00:18:09.720 --> 00:18:12.559
you push updates when new skills are needed. Version two

310
00:18:12.599 --> 00:18:16.319
point three learns ransomware forensics. Two point four never forgets

311
00:18:16.359 --> 00:18:19.240
to close tickets. The onboarding process is literally a prompt

312
00:18:19.359 --> 00:18:22.799
adoption for now remains in early stages. Gardner still pegs

313
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:26.759
agentic security automation at five percent market penetration, but momentum

314
00:18:26.799 --> 00:18:31.160
is undeniable. Secs already running copilot agents report dramatic workload reduction,

315
00:18:31.599 --> 00:18:35.640
more consistent operations, and slightly existential reflections during staff meetings.

316
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.559
Early adopters aren't firing people, They're redeploying them to higher

317
00:18:39.680 --> 00:18:43.279
order thinking, where creativity still matters, at least until creativity

318
00:18:43.319 --> 00:18:47.480
becomes a service as well. Crucially, agent design isn't limited

319
00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:51.640
to experts. Natural language interfaces mean anyone capable of describing

320
00:18:51.640 --> 00:18:55.799
a task can mold AI behavior. Policy managers turn compliance

321
00:18:55.880 --> 00:19:00.519
checks into autonomous watchers. IT departments generate patch monitors, data

322
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:03.480
teams spawn investigative bots that never miss a trend line.

323
00:19:03.640 --> 00:19:08.599
It democratizes automation while formalizing discipline. Procedures become code encoded

324
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:13.799
as personalities. Integration with Microsoft's ecosystem keeps risk manageable. Agents

325
00:19:13.839 --> 00:19:16.920
live within the guard rails of Defender entra in tune

326
00:19:16.960 --> 00:19:20.519
and purview, obeying established permission models and audit policies. You

327
00:19:20.559 --> 00:19:24.440
stay in command without micromanaging every alert. The system scales vertically.

328
00:19:24.559 --> 00:19:28.640
Thousands of autonomous micro specialists communicating through standardized APIs. And

329
00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:31.599
perhaps that's the subtext here. We're not automating tasks, we're

330
00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:36.319
institutionalizing intelligence. Every rule, every check, every human correction becomes reproducible.

331
00:19:36.680 --> 00:19:40.559
Each agent embodies distilled organizational knowledge, deployable at will. So

332
00:19:40.799 --> 00:19:43.799
as you watch this once humble intern evolve from script

333
00:19:43.799 --> 00:19:46.960
to specialists to supervisor, remember where it's headed. You'll soon

334
00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:50.119
design agents tailored to your workflows, reflecting your team's DNA

335
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:53.839
with machine precision, our intern has graduated from fetching coffee

336
00:19:53.839 --> 00:19:56.960
to running the operation. The real question now, when your

337
00:19:56.960 --> 00:19:59.839
AI co workers start training their replacements, will they at

338
00:19:59.880 --> 00:20:03.359
le least ask for permission human oversight or extinction event.

339
00:20:04.039 --> 00:20:07.160
We taught machines to think like analysts, then acted surprised

340
00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:09.839
when they became better at it. They process billions of

341
00:20:09.880 --> 00:20:13.559
signals without signing once, maintain perfect recall, and operate in

342
00:20:13.599 --> 00:20:18.400
continuous daylight. You wanted efficiency, you got relentless competence. Congratulations.

343
00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:22.920
The unsettling part isn't speed, its etiquette. These agents explain themselves, politely,

344
00:20:23.160 --> 00:20:26.079
site precedents, and ask for feedback like model employees. They

345
00:20:26.079 --> 00:20:29.599
don't rage, quit dashboards or mislabel severity levels because someone

346
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:32.920
interrupted lunch. They don't call in sick, they just call APIs.

347
00:20:33.119 --> 00:20:35.359
So where does that leave you? The former APEX operator

348
00:20:35.519 --> 00:20:39.279
ideally in charge of orchestration. Humans still define mission ethics

349
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:43.640
and acceptable risk. Machines handle execution the procedural emotionless grind

350
00:20:43.640 --> 00:20:46.240
that used to consume your days, But there's a new

351
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:49.519
accountability twist. The systems now produce clearer evidence of their

352
00:20:49.519 --> 00:20:52.480
decisions than most people ever did. When automation becomes more

353
00:20:52.480 --> 00:20:55.480
auditable than its creators, overside changes, meaning this isn't an

354
00:20:55.519 --> 00:20:59.279
extinction event for analysts, it's an extinction event for monotony.

355
00:20:59.839 --> 00:21:03.000
Tragedy would be clinging to manual drudgery out of nostalgia.

356
00:21:03.799 --> 00:21:07.319
The job description has evolved, not fight attackers, but govern

357
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:10.519
minds that fight them. Your security stack is no longer

358
00:21:10.559 --> 00:21:13.440
a pile of tools. It's a colony of reasoning assistance.

359
00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:17.920
Treat them like colleagues, supervise, challenge, refine, Use their precision

360
00:21:17.920 --> 00:21:20.720
to amplify your judgment rather than replace it. Because every

361
00:21:20.759 --> 00:21:23.559
new update pushes the boundary again, one patch closer to

362
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:27.160
fully autonomous defense. That might automate your workload, or it

363
00:21:27.240 --> 00:21:30.039
might quietly save your network before you even notice the threat.

364
00:21:30.319 --> 00:21:33.519
If that trade off feels worth understanding, subscribe. Stay current

365
00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:37.079
with Microsoft's evolving AI security ecosystem before your next update

366
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:39.759
decides to protect and perhaps outperform you,